Match 2: Bread vs poker_dummy101

You are adding right indeed. Played 2 to get to 12. Again, congratulations !This was a blast.Hope to do this in the future.

Maybe.. Str you need all 6, it could happen GL

Thanks for the support Billy. I am trying my ass off .

yup that hadda hurt, had 'em picked also but you woulda gone through. coupla tough beats this round, but a coupla wins i shouldnt have got either

Guessing action points like the other contests

I really hope that wouldn't be the way to do it. It doesn't tell you anywhere your action points for the round. Way too much effort to count it up yourself.

Tiebreakers are built into Tourneys by default. The order is currently DQ (whether someone made minimum picks), Units, Win %, # of wins, and Action Points. Action points would be the last possible tiebreaker.

Thank you BBB.My run of luck has been unbelievable.Win or not,this,along with the other 2 contests I entered ,have been sooo much fun.Lucky enough too place in all three. Also,a big Thank You to all those that work at SBR and make all of this happen .You guys are great!

Thanks. Kobe going out probably helped, although I doubt San Antonio finishes with 105 if he finishes the game.

6 days ago u wrote on someones post that someone who claimed to have the same picks wasn't cheating..now u bring up someone else who is cheating by having 3 games the same picks ??? cmon dude! you are full of it!

Huh? Is this a serious post? Someone else help me out. Brakon the situations are not even remotely similar.

u r full of sht sir. hope u get hit by a car

It is clear that Kustac was cheating every round he won after he got a lead due to a glitch in the still-in-development sbrpicks bracket tourneys. That is a pretty harsh comment you said to BBB, and very uncalled for. Pretty gross. I am also curious if Kustac is barred, but I doubt that he will be since there is no real proof that he cheated despite the statistical improbability and betting times that make the accusations past conspiracy status.

Thanks Deluxe. Kustac is not banned, nor will he be. According to Lou it wasn't cheating, but rather taking advantage of a system glitch. He said, and I quote, "we can't decide not to pay players if a public glitch is discovered, unfortunately, it would take away from the integrity of the prizing."

how does picking 3 games that are the same as your opponent cheating. i know if you are ahead and you choose exact games as your opponent you are an auto lock to beat him. But are you saying that kustac saw pending plays from his opponent...cmon man....u dont think it was a coincidence that 3 out of 11 plays were the same ?? oh my god....

Hmm that's odd. Thanks for the heads up. Tomorrow there will be more information on the software after getting a chance to evaluate what happened tonight. I appreciate the feedback yourself and others have provided, and apologize for the bumps in the road along the way. Tournaments are our rawest form of SBRpicks presently, but that will change.

Okay here's what happened. "Pending plays" were removed from the page that the exploit was available, which was clicking an opponents record and then sorting by league. The actual match up page you can still view pending picks, but they'll never appear in that section until after the game begins.

Credits will be paid by the sportsbooks at the conclusion of the contest. 2 business days from the end date is the likely payment time.

I understand. The software is being worked on today and as soon as the site is updated the glitch will be done. I'm hoping by tonight but I'll update as soon as it's done.

I'm not sure what glitch you're referring to, but I was definitely not able to view his picks before the game started. I was able to correctly guess which game he was taking because there were only 2 left on the board, and I had a 50-50 shot.

wtf?

do u know any english prick ?

im just messin wit you...no harm intended.